What the sources say
Ross SealOmmatophoca rossii
Every figure, record and mechanism on the Ross Seal profile was written from a source, and this is the working table behind it: 43 claims checked word for word against these sources. The left column is what the page says. The right column is the source's own words, copied, not paraphrased; a ... marks a cut and[brackets] an insertion. Open any source and check it yourself.
Profile updated
Source
01
Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan
Ommatophoca rossii. Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan.
- The page sayswith enormous eyes
- The source says
disproportionately large eyes (70mm in diameter)
- The page sayshas disproportionately large eyes, 70 millimetres in diameter, which make it easy to distinguish from closely related seals
- The source says
Ross seals can easily be distinguished from closely related seals by their disproportionately large eyes (70mm in diameter)
- The page saysfemales average larger than males
- The source says
Males average smaller than females
- The page saysThey have a thick neck, a slender body and the shortest hair and whiskers of any true seal
- The source says
with a thick neck and a slender body. Members of this species have short body hairs, with the shortest hair and vibrissae of any phocid
Note: phocid = true seal, vibrissae = whiskers - The page says70-millimetre eyes
- The source says
disproportionately large eyes (70mm in diameter)
- The page saysThey measure 70 millimetres across, disproportionately large for the animal, and they make the species easy to tell apart from closely related seals. The large eye sockets in the skull are a good way to identify one.
- The source says
Ross seals can easily be distinguished from closely related seals by their disproportionately large eyes (70mm in diameter). The large eye sockets in the skull are a good character by which a Ross seal can be identified
Source
02
Australian Antarctic Division 2018
Ross seal. Australian Antarctic Division, 2018.
- The page saysa loner
- The source says
They tend to be solitary
- The page saysThey may be an adaptation for hunting in dimly lit depths
- The source says
Their enormous eyes may be an adaptation for hunting in the dimly-lit depths
- The page saysthey tend to be solitary
- The source says
They tend to be solitary
- The page saysRoss seals are slightly smaller on average than leopard and crabeater seals, reaching about 3 metres and 200 kilograms
- The source says
Ross seals are slightly smaller on average than leopard and crabeater seals, reaching about 3 metres and 200 kg
Note: AAD (2018) is the current institution page; ADW's sex-split ranges (King 1990-era, max 250 cm) were dropped in its favour - The page says70-millimetre eyes that may be an adaptation for hunting in dimly lit depths
- The source says
Their enormous eyes may be an adaptation for hunting in the dimly-lit depths
Note: the 70mm figure is the adw-ross-seal claim above; AAD supplies the dim-light hunting framing - The page saysDense Antarctic pack ice
- The source says
live mainly on the densest pack ice
Source
03
AnAge: The Animal Ageing and Longevity Database, Human Ageing Genomic Resources
AnAge entry for Ommatophoca rossii. AnAge: The Animal Ageing and Longevity Database, Human Ageing Genomic Resources.
- The page saysIn the wild, Ross seals are believed to live up to 21 years
- The source says
In the wild, these animals are believed to live up to 21 years
Source
04
Wege, Bornemann & Bester 2023
Wege, Bornemann & Bester (2023). The nightlife of a Ross seal: diving and haul-out behaviour from the eastern Weddell Sea. Antarctic Science.
- The page saysoften dives past 300 metres
- The source says
Ross seals mostly dived between 100 and 200 m deep, often > 300 m
- The page saysUnlike crabeater and Weddell seals, which remain in the ice year round, Ross seals spend most of their life cycle foraging in the open ocean
- The source says
unlike other Antarctic counterparts such as the crabeater seal ( Lobodon carcinophaga ) and Weddell seal ( Leptonychotes weddellii ) that remain in the ice year round, travel away from the Antarctic continent and spend most of their life cycle in the open ocean to forage pelagically
- The page saysFive seals tagged in the eastern Weddell Sea mostly dived 100 to 200 metres deep and often beyond 300, usually for 5 to 12 minutes
- The source says
recorded the dive behaviour ( n = 5) and/or haul-out behaviour ( n = 9) of Ross seals in the eastern Weddell Sea (2016–2019). Ross seals mostly dived between 100 and 200 m deep, often > 300 m, and for 5–12 min in duration
- The page saysearlier studies recorded occasional dives close to 800 metres
- The source says
In previous studies, Ross seals also dived to depths of 100–300 m, occasionally reaching depths of close to 800 m
- The page saysFrom March to July the seals dived deeper at twilight and shallowest at night, and their diving effort was highest at night
- The source says
During March–July, when Ross seals forage pelagically, diving metrics varied diurnally. The seals dived deeper during twilight and shallowest at night, while the number of dives and diving duration did not follow a clear diurnal pattern. Consequently, diving effort was highest during the night.
- The page saysWhy is unknown: the authors suggest the seals may be reaching their aerobic dive limit, which would cap how long each dive lasts
- The source says
Why diving effort (dive residuals) was highest at night is currently unknown. We suggest that the seals are potentially reaching their aerobic dive limit and therefore their dive duration is limited
- The page saysThey eat squid and fish, and occasionally crustaceans and bottom-dwelling invertebrates
- The source says
They prey on squid, fish and occasionally crustaceans and benthic invertebrates
Note: bottom-dwelling = benthic - The page saysIn the open ocean they take myctophid fish (lanternfish) and cephalopods, and over the continental shelf during their annual moult, Antarctic silverfish
- The source says
Myctophid fish and cephalopods are taken while foraging in the open ocean, and Antarctic silverfish (Pleuragramma antarctica) are taken when the seals forage over the continental shelf during their annual moult
Note: lanternfish is the common name of the Myctophidae, a gloss rather than a claim - The page saysPups have been sighted from 2 October to 22 November
- The source says
with pups sighted as early as 2 October and as late as 22 November
- The page saysThree tracked females that entered the pack ice in the breeding season stayed hauled out for five to seven days at a stretch, broken by one- to three-hour spells in the water
- The source says
Three females that entered the pack ice during breeding season were hauled out continuously for 5–7 days, punctuated by water entries for 1–3 h during and/or after such continuous haul-outs over the breeding season
- The page saysSquid and myctophid (lantern) fish in open water, plus Antarctic silverfish near the continental shelf during the moult
- The source says
Myctophid fish and cephalopods are taken while foraging in the open ocean, and Antarctic silverfish (Pleuragramma antarctica) are taken when the seals forage over the continental shelf during their annual moult
- The page saysTagged Ross seals mostly dive between 100 and 200 metres and often go past 300, for 5 to 12 minutes and often more than 20.
- The source says
Ross seals mostly dived between 100 and 200 m deep, often > 300 m, and for 5–12 min in duration, often > 20 min
- The page saysEarlier tagging studies recorded occasional dives close to 800 metres.
- The source says
In previous studies, Ross seals also dived to depths of 100–300 m, occasionally reaching depths of close to 800 m
- The page saysHundreds of Metres Down
- The source says
Ross seals mostly dived between 100 and 200 m deep, often > 300 m
Source
05
Bester et al. 2019
Bester et al. (2019). Ross seal distribution in the Weddell Sea: fact and fallacy. Polar Biology.
- The page saysThe least-studied of Antarctica's ice-breeding seals
- The source says
the least numerous and least studied of the Antarctic ice-breeding seals
- The page saysRoss seals are the least numerous and least studied of the seals that breed on Antarctic pack ice
- The source says
the least numerous and least studied of the Antarctic ice-breeding seals
- The page saysRange maps that show them throughout the Weddell Sea are at odds with earlier surveys there
- The source says
the generalised continuous distribution maps of Ross seals throughout the Weddell Sea (e.g., Reeves et al. 2002; Shirihai 2002; Hückstädt 2018) are at odds with results from earlier work (Erickson et al. 1969; Siniff et al. 1970; Erickson and Hofman 1974; Erickson 1984; Erickson and Hanson 1990). Then no Ross seals were sighted
Note: the earlier work is the sighting surveys the next sentence of the source describes - The page saysThe evidence suggests they are absent from the Weddell Sea in winter, and from its inner reaches past about 73 degrees south in summer and early autumn, when they occur in number in the eastern Weddell Sea, east of about 30 degrees west
- The source says
Evidence suggests that Ross seals are absent from the Weddell Sea during winter, utilizing the northernmost fringes of the pack-ice during the spring breeding (pupping and mating) season. Ross seals are absent from the inner reaches of the Weddell Sea past about 73 o S in summer and early autumn when they occur in number in the eastern Weddell Sea eastwards from about 30 o W longitude.
- The page saysDense Antarctic pack ice for breeding and moulting; the open Southern Ocean for the rest of the year
- The source says
because of their long foraging trips north of the pack-ice into pelagic areas of the Southern Ocean for most of the year and return to the pack-ice only for short periods to breed and moult
- The page saysIt is the least numerous and least studied of the Antarctic ice-breeding seals
- The source says
the least numerous and least studied of the Antarctic ice-breeding seals
- The page saysFor most of the year it makes long foraging trips north of the pack ice into the open Southern Ocean, and it returns to the pack ice only for short periods to breed and moult
- The source says
because of their long foraging trips north of the pack-ice into pelagic areas of the Southern Ocean for most of the year and return to the pack-ice only for short periods to breed and moult
Source
06
Loza et al. 2017
Loza et al. (2017). Sensory anatomy of the most aquatic of carnivorans: the Antarctic Ross seal, and convergences with other mammals. Biology Letters.
- The page saysCT scans of specimens show changes inside the head too: compared with other true seals, the semicircular canals of the inner ear are narrower and a brain structure called the paraflocculus is smaller, independent of body size
- The source says
The use of non-invasive computed tomography on specimens of this rare animal reveals, relative to other species of phocids, a reduction in the diameters of the semicircular canals and the parafloccular volume. These features are independent of size effects.
Note: narrower = reduced diameter; true seals = phocids; the title's 'cranio-sensory anatomy' is the 'inside the head' - The page saysWhales and dolphins show parallel changes, a case of convergent evolution toward aquatic life that stops short of other traits: the Ross seal lacks their reduced eye muscles and shortened neck
- The source says
These transformations parallel those recorded in cetaceans, but these do not extend to other morphological features such as the reduction in eye muscles and the length of the neck, emphasizing the independence of some traits in convergent evolution to aquatic life
Note: cetaceans (whales and dolphins) is the plain-language gloss for the source's term
Source
07
Southwell et al. 2008
Southwell et al. (2008). Estimating population status under conditions of uncertainty: the Ross seal in East Antarctica. Antarctic Science.
- The page saysEven estimating the Ross seal's population status has proved extremely difficult
- The source says
estimating the population status of the Ross seal has proved extremely difficult
- The page saysEstimating the population status of the Ross seal has proved extremely difficult.
- The source says
estimating the population status of the Ross seal has proved extremely difficult
- The page saysA 1999/2000 survey of the pack ice off East Antarctica, between 64 and 150 degrees east, gave best estimates of 41,300 to 55,900 seals in that region, with plausible estimates ranging from 20,500 to 226,600.
- The source says
a survey was undertaken in 1999/2000 to estimate the status of the Ross seal population in the pack ice off East Antarctica between 64–150°E ... Best estimates of abundance in the survey region ranged from 41 300–55 900 seals. Limits on plausible estimates ranged from 20 500 (lower 2.5 percentile) to 226 600 (upper 97.5 percentile).
Note: the answer spells the figures with comma thousands separators; the source uses spaces, same values
Source
08
Hughes et al. 2024
Hughes et al. (2024). The Antarctic Specially Protected Species conservation management tool: Development, use and future outlook. Biological Conservation.
- The page saysSince the Antarctic Treaty system first provided for Specially Protected Species in 1964, only the fur seals and the Ross seal have been listed, and the fur seals were de-listed in 2006
- The source says
which first provided for the designation of Antarctic Specially Protected Species (SPS) in 1964. Over the past 60 years, only the fur seals (genus Arctocephalus) and Ross seal (Ommatophoca rossii) have been listed as SPS, with the fur seals subsequently having been de-listed in 2006
- The page saysThe tool has therefore remained little used
- The source says
The SPS conservation tool has therefore remained little used by the ATCM
- The page saysA Rarely Used Protection
- The source says
The SPS conservation tool has therefore remained little used by the ATCM
Source
09
Hückstädt 2026
Hückstädt (2026). Ommatophoca rossii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2026: e.T15269A95971509.
- The page saysLeast Concern
- The source says
IUCN Red List category: Least Concern (LC). Ommatophoca rossii J.E. Gray, 1844, IUCN taxon 15269.
How the table was made: a writer drafted the profile from these sources and logged each claim with its quote, a reviewer with nothing but this table checked every sentence said no more than its quote, and a script confirmed each quote appears word for word in the source. The method is in the site'sAbout page.